GOP senators want census funds cut if citizenship isn't asked

Digg
November 17, 2009
Bobbi Bowman

By Bobbi Bowman

Bobbi BowmanThe U.S. Senate finally turned aside an attempt to add a citizenship question to the upcoming 2010 Census.

The Washington Post reported Nov. 5 that “Lawmakers voted 60 to 39 to effectively kill an amendment by Sens. David Vitter (R-La.) and Robert Bennett (R-Utah) that would have excluded illegal immigrants from population totals used to apportion Congressional seats in each state. The pair argued that the high numbers of illegal immigrants in larger, heavily-urbanized states would mean that at least nine other states would lose Congressional seats
following next year's census.”

The senators were really asking to revive the citizenship question which was included on the census form for more than 1000 years. It was only with 1960 census, that the Census Bureau stopped asking all residents whether they were U.S. citizens or where they were born.

Let’s trace the history of the census and citizenship.

The Constitution requires that every 10 years the government count every man, woman and child living in the country. The Founding Fathers created the decennial census to determine how many seats to award each state in the House of Representatives.

Yes, the census has always been about power. That’s why the South insisted that the census count non-citizens. When US marshals conducted the first census in 1790, they counted the slaves too.

Slaves were not citizens. They had no rights. They were property like the pigs. But, the census counted them as three-fifths of a person to give southern states more political clout.

The citizenship question first appeared in the 1820 Census and remained there in various forms for 170 years, until it was dropped for the 1960 count.

From 1970 to 2000, questions about place of birth were not part of the general census but were asked of a representative sample of residents.

The 2010 Census form that all residents will receive in March contains 10 questions, making it one of the shortest in history.

Place of birth and citizenship questions are now part of the American Community Survey, an ongoing nationwide sample that provides more snapshots of what the population looks like and how it lives.

Every 60 to 80 years a nation mostly of immigrants conducts an ugly debate over immigration between the descendants of earlier arrivals and of those newly arrived. The census always reflects that very loud conversation.

The Last Word: The13th Amendment to the Constitution granted citizenship to slaves in 1865.

 

Here’s a sampling of how the census has asked about citizenship. The citizenship question first appeared in the 1820 Census and continued to be asked until 1960.

1820 — Number of foreigners not naturalized.

1850 — Place of birth. In the 1840s large numbers of Irish began arriving in the United States to escape the Potato Famine in Ireland. They encountered widespread discrimination and hostility largely because they were poor and Catholic.

1870 — Is the person a male citizen of the United States of 21 years or more?

1910 — Is the person naturalized or an alien? This census showed that immigrants comprised nearly 15 percent of the population, the highest percentage ever. Waves of Italians, Poles, Jews and Greeks came to America from the 1880s until World War I.

1950 — If foreign born, is the person naturalized?

1960 — Only five questions. None about citizenship or place of birth.

1970-2000 — The place-of-birth questions were not part of the general census but were asked of a representative sample of residents.

 

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
19 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.

Download the Oakland Tribune Community Journalism Project's Community Correspondent Form.
JOIN OUR BLOG DISCUSSION
Come join Sally Lehrman, a professor and journalist who writes regularly on race, gender and identity issues and Maynard Institute President Dori J. Maynard as we talk about the best and worst of media coverage and diversity. Add comments and give us your thoughts.

BLACK HISTORY MONTH
The Maynard Institute gears up for its coming celebration of Black History Month

Much of today's media coverage breaks the country into black and white, North and South, male and female. Doing so fails to capture the complexity of American life that journalists need to portray.

Based on the late Robert C. Maynard's belief that the five fault lines of race, class, gender, generation and geography are the most enduring forces shaping lives, experiences and social tensions in this country, the Maynard Institute's Fault Lines framework helps journalists build a more diverse source list, have more voices in stories and determine which fault lines are at work in complex issues.
[more...]
Black History Project
Stories of the African American journalists who broke into media during the '60s and '70s.
Caldwell Journals
An account of the pioneers who broke the color barrier in America's newspapers
Ed Bradley
View video from his interview as part of the Black Journalists Movement Project

Black History Month and Beyond documents and preserves the stories of those courageous African American journalists who broke into general circulation media during the turbulent 1960s and 1970s. [more...]

Martin Reynolds
View an interview with Martin Reynolds, Managing Editor at the Oakland Tribune.
Media Academy
View video from the Maynard Media Academy at Harvard University
Chauncey Bailey
View video and more from the Chauncey Bailey Project
History Project
Stories of the African American journalists who broke into media during the '60s and '70s.
Caldwell Journals
An account of the pioneers who broke the color barrier in America's newspapers
Ed Bradley
View video from his interview as part of the Black Journalists Movement Project